<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Blogging: Lifestreams are Lifeless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1rick.com/blog/evolution-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1rick.com/blog/evolution-blogging/</link>
	<description>A Canadian in Japan, by way of China</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:20:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.1rick.com/blog/evolution-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1958</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1rick.com/blog/?p=381#comment-1958</guid>
		<description>Cheers Paul. I think it&#039;s important to focus more on the message rather than the medium. But having send that, I don&#039;t want to throw a bunch of garbage at a reader and say &quot;Hey, there&#039;s a message in there somewhere for you!&quot; 

As for my blogs, yeah -- they tend to be all over the map. But I tend to be myself the most here, for better or for worse. I don&#039;t really want them all in a single channel, because they&#039;re all different topics. I do have a catch-all feed (1rick.com/rss), but I don&#039;t recommend using it! 

Cheers for putting me on to that Malik article. And thx for the thoughts.

R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Paul. I think it&#8217;s important to focus more on the message rather than the medium. But having send that, I don&#8217;t want to throw a bunch of garbage at a reader and say &#8220;Hey, there&#8217;s a message in there somewhere for you!&#8221; </p>
<p>As for my blogs, yeah &#8212; they tend to be all over the map. But I tend to be myself the most here, for better or for worse. I don&#8217;t really want them all in a single channel, because they&#8217;re all different topics. I do have a catch-all feed (1rick.com/rss), but I don&#8217;t recommend using it! </p>
<p>Cheers for putting me on to that Malik article. And thx for the thoughts.</p>
<p>R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Papadimitriou</title>
		<link>http://www.1rick.com/blog/evolution-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1957</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Papadimitriou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1rick.com/blog/?p=381#comment-1957</guid>
		<description>Love your post, Rick. It reminds me of the discussion we had on Twitter (kinda of livestreaming there, heh ^^) when I mentioned blog strategy.

I agree with you that most lifestreams are useless. Too much noise, not enough coherence. This is why I&#039;m trying and still struggling to find a way to talk about all the subjects that matter to me (social media, Japan, photography, etc ...yes I may have too many, was born like this) in a consolidated way.

The problem with lifestreams or social broadcasters (or shouters) is that everything goes. The tuning has to been done by the receiver, while I think it should be done by the sender (to a point), like choosing a TV channel. I want to find a way that allows for people to follow only the topics of interest, not forcing them to go through useless blog entries for them. I think I&#039;ve found how to do it, but the coding required to do it is too big for my time now. I&#039;ll wait until Wordpress MU is integrated into WP to play with it. Or do it in a simpler way.

You have a very interesting way of balancing your blogs, yet I sometimes wish I had a single channel to see what you&#039;re doing. It&#039;s Twitter for now, but I hope technology allows us to find smarter ways not to shout.

Cheers,

Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your post, Rick. It reminds me of the discussion we had on Twitter (kinda of livestreaming there, heh ^^) when I mentioned blog strategy.</p>
<p>I agree with you that most lifestreams are useless. Too much noise, not enough coherence. This is why I&#8217;m trying and still struggling to find a way to talk about all the subjects that matter to me (social media, Japan, photography, etc &#8230;yes I may have too many, was born like this) in a consolidated way.</p>
<p>The problem with lifestreams or social broadcasters (or shouters) is that everything goes. The tuning has to been done by the receiver, while I think it should be done by the sender (to a point), like choosing a TV channel. I want to find a way that allows for people to follow only the topics of interest, not forcing them to go through useless blog entries for them. I think I&#8217;ve found how to do it, but the coding required to do it is too big for my time now. I&#8217;ll wait until Wordpress MU is integrated into WP to play with it. Or do it in a simpler way.</p>
<p>You have a very interesting way of balancing your blogs, yet I sometimes wish I had a single channel to see what you&#8217;re doing. It&#8217;s Twitter for now, but I hope technology allows us to find smarter ways not to shout.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
